|
Guidelines for Reviewers
Ratings (to be sent to Authors for feedback)
Please rate this article on the following criteria
using a scale of 1 - 5 (1 being poor, 5 being excellent):
Relevance for knowledge about practice in the field
of child welfare
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Originality
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Quality of literature review
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Underlying conceptualization
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Organization and logic
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Support for points
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Clarity of expression (quality of writing, grammar)
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
___________________________________________________
|
| very incomplete |
revision needed |
satisfactory |
good |
excellent |
Your recommendation (check one):
____ Accept
____ Accept with incorporation of substantial revisions noted
____ Reject
Comments to be sent to Authors: (Here
reviewers should elaborate with feedback for authors about the strengths
of the article and how it might be improved, including if appropriate
suggestions for relevant readings and resources.)
Comments for the Editor only:
|
